Friday 31 August 2012

China August Iron Ore Estimated To Drop 10% As Prices Fall

By Bloomberg News - Aug 30, 2012
China’s iron ore output probably fell about 10 percent this month as tumbling prices squeezed out costly producers and steelmakers used cheaper imports, the China Metallurgical Mining Enterprise Association said.

Production will be about 115 million metric tons this month, little changed from July, Lei Pingxi, executive vice chairman of the association, said today in an interview in Suzhou at a Umetal conference. Output was 127.5 million tons in August last year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics.

The nation’s iron ore output had the steepest decline in July in four years, as the world’s largest metals consumer increased purchases from producers such as Brazil’s Vale SA (VALE3) and Rio Tinto Group. Prices tumbled 35 percent this year to $90.30 a dry ton yesterday, the lowest level since November 2009, according to a gauge compiled by The Steel Index Ltd.

“The competitiveness of Chinese iron ore mines is falling because of falling prices, higher construction costs and taxes,” Lei said. About 42 percent of China’s iron ore mines have production costs of greater than $100 a ton, he said.

China’s iron ore output in the three months to the end of August is about 5 percent lower than the previous three months, Lei said. The capacity use ratio at Chinese miners was 62 percent, according to researcher Umetal.com.

Supply, Demand

Global seaborne iron ore supply may rise 50 million tons in the second half this year from the first half, while demand may decline, Zhang Dianbo, the general manager of raw-material purchasing at China’s second-largest steelmaker Baosteel Group Corp., said at the conference.

Chinese steelmakers, overwhelmed by increasing capacity and sluggish demand, have struggled to remain profitable as steel prices dropped to an almost three-year low this month. Domestic mills had a combined loss of 1.9 billion yuan ($299 million) in July, with an average profit margin of just 0.03 percent in the seven months to July, Wang Xiaoqi, vice chairman of China Iron and Steel Association, said today.

Still, Chinese mills haven’t made significant production cuts, Umetal analyst Zhang Jiabin said. The steelmakers’ operating rate at Tangshan in Hebei province, China’s biggest region by output, is 91 percent, up from 78 percent in October, he said.

China’s ore contains about 20 percent iron, compared with more than 55 percent in Australian ore, making it more expensive to extract, Deutsche Bank AG estimates. China has about 1,500 iron ore producers nationwide, with 1,000 smaller mines accounting for about a third of output, Lei said.

Floor Price

Iron ore prices are well below recognized floor prices of $120 a ton, suggesting high-cost iron ore supply closures will not be far off, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. (ANZ) said Aug. 28.

The recent plunge in prices prompted contract ore buyers to seek other ways to price the steelmaking raw material. The current pricing method, based on indexes, doesn’t reflect the needs of larger buyers and needs improvement, Baosteel’s Zhang said. The Shanghai-based company buys ore on a quarterly basis.

As much as 10 percent of globally traded ore is sold through public auctions, while the remaining 90 percent is bought at index prices that are determined by bids, he said.

Australia and Brazil accounted for 66.2 percent of China’s total ore imports in the first half, up from 64 percent last year as imports from India dwindled, Umetal said.

Iron ore set for worst month since October 2011

Fri Aug 31, 2012
* China mills cut iron ore stocks to below 20 days - Macquarie

* Shanghai rebar has worst month in nearly a year
By Manolo Serapio Jr
HONG KONG, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Iron ore looks set to hit a near three-year low on Friday and to end August with its worst performance in 10 months as Chinese steel producers shun fresh cargoes in the face of waning steel demand.

Iron ore has been the hardest hit among industrial commodities by China's slowdown, losing 36 percent this year as falling steel prices curbed demand from the biggest consumer of the raw material.

Iron ore with 62 percent iron content, the industry benchmark, dropped 1.8 percent to $88.70 per tonne on Thursday, the lowest since October 2009, according to data provider Steel Index.

For the month, the steelmaking component has lost more than 24 percent, the most since it fell 31 percent last October.

"This is all about destocking because I don't think we're seeing a massive collapse in end-user demand for steel.

Everybody's just reducing their inventory of iron ore," said Graeme Train, analyst at Macquarie in Shanghai.

Smaller Chinese steel mills had cut their iron ore inventories to about 17-18 days worth of consumption, versus 27-30 days over the past year, said Train.

He said the "absolute minimum" inventory would be 14 days, which is about the period it takes for cargo imported from top exporter Australia to reach China.

"So there's potential for the mills to destock further, so we could see prices go down to $75-$80," he said.

Shanghai steel rebar futures have dropped about 17 percent this year, less than half the percentage loss for iron ore.

Shanghai rebar fell nearly 10 percent this month, the steepest drop in almost a year, as losses extended to a fifth straight month.

In the face of weak steel demand, most Chinese mills have kept their iron ore inventories low, with some opting to buy small lots from port stockpiles instead of ordering fresh, big cargoes.

"I'm not getting any inquiries at all today," said a physical iron ore trader in Singapore, who forecast that prices would only see support at about $70.

Brazil's Vale SA, the world's top iron ore miner, said it was surprised that prices had fallen below $110 per tonne, which it attributed to excess supply rather than weak demand.

Jose Carlos Martins, who runs Vale's iron ore business, however, said the company's production costs were still well below current prices.

"We are one of the most efficient producers," he said. "We will be the last to leave the market."

  Shanghai rebar futures and iron ore indexes at 0719 GMT

  Contract                          Last    Change   Pct Change
  SHFE REBAR JAN3                   3411    -26.00        -0.76
  PLATTS 62 PCT INDEX              90.75     -1.75        -1.89
  THE STEEL INDEX 62 PCT INDEX      88.7     -1.60        -1.77
  METAL BULLETIN INDEX             89.24     -0.85        -0.94

  Rebar in yuan/tonne
  Index in dollars/tonne, show close for the previous trading day

(Editing by Robert Birsel and Chris Lewis)

Chinese companies to invest $8.6b in local mineral processing

Linda Yulisman, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | Business | Fri, August 31 2012
Three Chinese firms will invest US$8.6 billion to build mineral processing facilities this year in Indonesia, a key supplier of metal ore to China, a minister says.

Describing it as “a step forward for processing local mineral resources into metal products,” Industry Minister MS Hidayat said the plan would realize the visions of both nations.

The commitment was marked by two memorandums of understanding inked by the Industry Ministry’s director general for manufacturing-based industry, Panggah Susanto, and representatives of the Chinese firms on Thursday.

“We expect the planned investments will contribute to our economic growth by reducing our dependence on imported products and strengthening the structure of our metals industry through integration of the upstream and downstream sectors,” Hidayat said during the signing ceremony.

According to the plan, Beijing Shuang Zhong Li Investment Management Co. Ltd. will invest around $7.1 billion until 2020 to build an alumina refinery, an aluminum smelter and 1,250 megawatts in supporting power plants in Riau or West Kalimantan.

The refinery, expected to produce 1.8 million tons of alumina per year, is expected to start operation in 2015, while the smelter, expected to produce 600,000 tons of ingots a year, is slated to start service in 2018.

Meanwhile, Oriental Mining and Minerals Resources Co. Ltd. and Rui Tong Investment Co. Ltd. will spend $1.5 billion until 2019 to build a plant in West Java to process iron sand into direct reduced iron. The plant, expected to begin operation in 2016, will have the annual capacity to produce 6 million tons of direct reduced iron used for steel smelting and iron casting, among other things.

The investment comes after Indonesia, one of the world’s biggest suppliers of several mineral commodities, plans to impose a 20 percent export tax on 65 types of mineral commodities next year and completely ban raw mineral exports by 2014 to encourage investment and development in refineries and smelters.

In the first half of the year, Indonesia provided around 80 percent of the 25.42 million tons of bauxite needed by China, which comprises 40 percent of the global aluminum market, according to Reuters. However, exports tumbled significantly in June and July after the export restrictions rules, requiring firms to propose plans to build smelters or local processing, took effect.

The Chinese firms would team up with local partners for the projects were currently in talks for potential joint ventures, Hidayat said, declining to discuss specific firms.

Output of the firms’ production would go to both exports and the domestic market, where demand for semi-processed products has been recorded by local companies such as Inalum, which currently meet their need for semi-processed products through imports, he added.

More Chinese firms have pledged to increase their investment in Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s largest economy, in several industrial sectors, such energy, food processing, textiles and metal processing.

Indonesia has expected more investment from China to compensate for a widening trade deficit with the nation since the implementation of the ASEAN-China free trade agreement in 2010.

The nation’s non-oil and gas trade balance recently booked a $4.05 billion in deficit in trade with China, according to the Central Statistics Agency.

Brazilian Sugar At Ports Drops 10% In A Week On Dryness

By Isis Almeida - Aug 30, 2012
Bloomberg
The amount of sugar waiting to be loaded at the main ports in Brazil, the largest producer, dropped 10 percent in the past week as dry weather helped loading, according to agency Williams Servicos Maritimos Ltda.

About 1.91 million metric tons of sugar were ready for loading yesterday at the ports of Paranagua, Vitoria and Santos, the country’s biggest, data from the Recife, Brazil-based shipping agency e-mailed yesterday showed. That compares with about 2.14 million tons a week earlier.

Dry weather in the south and center south regions for three consecutive weeks kept ports “working on a normal basis without big queues of vessels causing delays,” Luiz Carlos dos Santos Jr., head of sugar brokerage operations at SA Commodities in Santos, said in a report e-mailed yesterday.

Brazil’s sugar-cane harvest will be helped by dry weather this week in producing areas, forecaster Somar Meteorologia said in a report e-mailed Aug. 27.
Dryness helped boost processing by 14 percent to 44.2 million tons in the first half of August, industry group Unica said.

Some 99,712 tons of sugar were scheduled to be shipped to Malaysia and 94,661 tons to China, the Williams Brasil data showed. Chinese buyers, who sold back some cargoes they had bought, were looking to purchase again as prices fell, according to Michael McDougall, head of the Brazil desk at Newedge Group in New York.

“Most of the market was not expecting China to come back in after their massive buying two months ago and then subsequent partial washout,” McDougall said in a report yesterday.

China, the world’s second-biggest sugar consumer after India, diverted about 370,000 tons of planned imports to other destinations, researcher Green Pool Commodity Specialists Pty Ltd. estimated on Aug. 20.

GRAINS-Soybeans fall on profit-taking, wheat flat ahead of Russia meeting

Fri Aug 31, 2012
* Soybeans slide after hitting contract peak

* Wheat steady ahead of Russian meeting

* Corn falls amid reports Isaac may cause less damage than expected
By Colin Packham
SYDNEY, Aug 31 (Reuters) - U.S. soybeans on Friday gave back all their gains from the previous session, when they touched a contract high, as traders took profits, with markets looking to a gathering of central bankers later in the day for clues on possible imminent monetary stimulus.

Wheat was flat -- though it remains on course for its first weekly gain since the end of July -- ahead of a critical meeting of Russian ministers that is expected to herald curbs to grain exports. Corn fell as traders speculated damage from Hurricane Isaac would be less severe than feared, with new-crop corn on course to record its biggest weekly fall in 11 weeks.

"Soybeans hit a record high on Thursday after impressive export numbers, but the market has fallen back today due to some profit-taking," said Ker Chung Yang, commodities analyst at Phillip Futures Singapore.

Front-month Chicago Board of Trade soybeans dropped 0.8 percent to $17.56 a bushel, having touched a contract peak on Thursday of $17.80-3/4 before slipping back slightly to finish up 0.4 percent.

CBOT November soybeans fell 0.99 percent to $17.46 a bushel after rising 0.6 percent in the previous session. But new-crop soybeans remain on course to finish up 0.84 percent on the week and 6.64 percent higher on the month, their third consecutive monthly gain.

December wheat was little changed at $9.02-1/2 a bushel after declining 0.3 percent the session before. New-crop wheat is up 1.63 percent for the week, its first weekly gain since the last week of July.

"There is ... some talk that the damage to grains from Isaac wont be as bad as predicted, while there will be some positioning ahead of the speech by Ben Bernanke," Ker Chung Yang said, referring to a speech to be delivered by the Federal Reserve Chairman in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

New-crop corn dropped 0.43 percent to $8.05 a bushel, having closed 0.62 percent lower on Thursday. Corn is down 0.4 percent on the week, its biggest weekly fall since the week ending June 17 after prices had soared due to the worst drought across the U.S. Midwest in 56 years.

STRONG SOYBEAN DEMAND

Exporters have not begun to ration their demand for soybeans despite high prices and expectations for a small U.S. harvest, data showed.

The U.S. Agriculture Department said weekly export sales of soybeans totaled 721,400 tonnes, near the high end of forecasts for 600,000 to 800,000 tonnes.

Wheat exports also came in line with expectations, but export sales of corn dropped below market forecasts.

Wheat traders readied for news on whether Russia will curb grain exports, with drought cutting harvest expectations below 2010 levels. A punitive tax on exports is a likely option as soon as October, according to a survey of international grain traders conducted by Reuters.

SovEcon agricultural analysts have reduced their forecast for Russia's 2012 wheat crop to 38 million tonnes, below levels produced in 2010 when Russia banned exports for nearly a year.

Torrential rain and wind from Isaac likely harmed some rice, cotton, soybean and sugarcane crops in the Deep South, but the rains will also bring relief to farmers struggling with the worst drought in more than 50 years, analysts said.
           
  Grains prices at  0325 GMT
  Contract        Last    Change  Pct chg  Two-day chg MA 30   RSI
  CBOT wheat     902.50    -0.50  -0.06%    -0.36%     902.25   57
  CBOT corn      805.00    -3.50  -0.43%    -1.04%     804.77   55
  CBOT soy      1746.00   -17.50  -0.99%    -0.40%    1651.32   63
  CBOT rice      $15.37    $0.06  +0.39%    -0.97%     $15.82   33
  WTI crude      $94.66    $0.04  +0.04%    -0.87%     $92.90   47
  Currencies                                               
  Euro/dlr       $1.252   $0.001  +0.10%    -0.10%
  USD/AUD         1.029    0.001  +0.09%    -0.51%
  Most active contracts
  Wheat, corn and soy US cents/bushel. Rice: USD per hundredweight
  RSI 14, exponential

(Editing by Joseph Radford)

Evening markets: weather fears lift soybeans to record high

30th Aug 2012, by Agrimoney
Soybean prices set a fresh record high, as fears for South American sowings added to the concerns over damage to US crops from Hurricane Isaac, while export data quelled ideas that high values had curtailed demand.

Ideas that futures were set for a calm end to the week, ahead of the meeting of central bankers in Jackson Hole and with a long US weekend ahead, disappeared as Hurricane Isaac landed heavy rains on some southern crop producing areas, while forcing 100-degrees-Fahrenheit temperatures in the north.

"I thought we would just chop along into the end of the month," Richard Feltes at broker RJ O'Brien told Agrimoney.com.

"But people are concerned about the heat in the north west and too much rain in south western states."

'More worrisome'

Furthermore, "it looks as if Brazil's sowing season is going to make a dry start because of dry weather".

Michael Cordonnier, the respected crop scout, told Agrimoney.com that, with two weeks to go before the sowing season, conditions are dry in Mato Grosso, Brazil's top soybean growing state, and with no sign of rains in the forecast.

Further ahead, ideas that the El Nino weather pattern may prove a weak one, as signalled by Australian meteorologists, have cut hopes for a bumper soybean harvest to replenish supplies diminished by drought to both the ongoing US crop and the South American one harvested earlier this year.

"The idea the El Nino may be mild, or not come at all, has got everybody quite concerned," Dr Cordonnier said.

"Weather in both North America and South America is more worrisome than in looked even a week ago."

WxRisk.com said: "The developing drought over Brazil is the main story and it will continue to be until the El Nino finally begins to affect the overall global atmosphere of pattern.

For the next week "rainfall again will remain non-existent across all of Brazil extending into all of Paraguay and into northern Argentina", the weather service said.

'Very solid number'

Furthermore, US soybean export sales data eased concerns that prices had risen far enough to choke off demand, coming in at 721,000 tonnes old crop and new combined, in line within expectations, and higher than year-ago levels despite high prices.

"The lack of rationing in the soybean complex is what is behind the grind higher" in prices, Darrell Holaday a Country Futures said.

"There is no better example of that than the US soybean export sales," which he termed a "very solid number".

Chicago soybeans for September hit a record high, for a spot contract, of $17.80 ¾ a bushel before easing to stand at $17.70 ¼ a bushel, up 0.4% on the day, with some 45 minutes of trading to go.

The better-traded November contract hit a contract high of $17.71 ¼ a bushel, before easing to $17.63 ½ a bushel, a gain of 0.6%.

Another Russia downgrade

However, those end-of-month concerns returned to land wheat in negative territory in the dying trades, after a day which it had spent mainly in positive ground.

Sure, there are waning ideas that a Russian agriculture ministry meeting on Friday will result in export curbs.

The prospect of curbs was downplayed both by Ilya Shestakov, deputy agriculture minister, and Maxim Basov, the chief executive of agricultural giant Ros Agro.

However, SovEcon cut further its forecast for the Russian wheat harvest, by 1m tonnes to 38m tonnes, cutting further the country's exportable surplus.

And concerns for Australian harvest are growing, with official meteorologists there cautioning of dry weather even if the El Nino, which itself threatens lower-than-average rains in the east, does not appear.

'Getting into feed channels'

Furthermore, demand signals were signalling green too, with weekly US export sales 500,000 tonnes, in line with expectations, and talk of buoyant domestic consumption too.

"Some wheat is getting into the feed channels amongst Texas and Colorado feed users," Mr Feltes said, even with the early corn harvest having replenished supplies.

Still, Chicago wheat for December returned some of the gains of the last session, ending down 0.4% at $9.03 a bushel. Kansas [hard red winter] wheat for December lost 0.7% to $9.22 a bushel, with US rains refreshing dry seed beds ahead of the winter wheat sowing season.

Earlier, Paris wheat for November closed up 0.7% at E266.75 a tonne, while London's November lot added 0.6% at E206.00 a tonne, underpinned by data showing continued setbacks to the UK harvest, and a drop to a 12-year low in on-farm stocks.

'Some rationing has occurred'

Corn was weakest of Chicago's big three crops, ending 0.6% lower at $8.08 ½ a bushel for the best-traded December contract.

But then corn export sales, at 134,000 tonnes, fell well short of expectations of at least 350,000 tonnes, fostering ideas of prices rationing demand.

"Corn export sales were weak. There is no question that higher prices have limited US corn export sales as new crop sales are down 18% compared to the same point a year ago," Country Futures' Darrell Holaday said.

"This is the obvious spot where some rationing has occurred."

September vs December

Still, with exports expected to account for only 12% of use of the US harvest, and concerns over storm damage from Hurricane Isaac to eastern Corn Belt crops, the damage was limited.

Indeed, Mr Holaday also noted a supportive point to the corn complex in the relatively firm performance of the September contract, which closed up 0.3% at $8.11 ½ a bushel even though it is approaching expiry, when investors risk physical exposure.

"The September contract has moved to a premium to December. This indicates that commercials are long the September and are more than willing to take delivery – a bullish signal."

'Uncomfortable shorting'

Among soft commodities, the selling pressure which drove New York October raw sugar contract back below 20 cents a pound in the last session faced two obstacles, the first being questions over the appetite of funds for adding yet more short positions.

"The market chat still seems to be conjecture on the size of the limit of the fund net short," Thomas Kujawa at Sucden Financial said, adding that "we feel uncomfortable shorting around present levels".

The second was a report that sugar production in Maharashtra, India's top producing Maharashtra state, will fall by some 30% year on year to 6.3m tonnes in 2012-13, thanks to the impact of a poor start to the monsoon on cane yields.

The comments, from the state Sugar Commissioner's office, countered some of the ideas of a reviving monsoon, which tie in with the idea of a soft El Nino.

However, while late contracts firmed, the October lot dropped 0.01 cents to 19.75 cents a pound, with a reduction to 58, from 71, in the last week in the queue of ships waiting to load sugar in Brazil strengthening bears' elbows.

Coffee drops

As did macroeconomic jitters, ahead of Friday's meeting of central bankers at Jackson Hole, nerves which sent stocks lower and the dollar some 0.2% higher, cutting the appeal of dollar-denominated assets to buyers in other currencies.

Still, there was more than that behind New York arabica coffee's 2.0% drop to 163.40 cents a pound, for December delivery.

Besides increasing stocks for delivery against New York futures, Brazil's Institute of Agricultural Economics estimated the Sao Paulo crop may end up at 5.24m bags for 2011-12, a rise of one-third year on year.

The rise was attributed to better agronomic practices and rains in late 2011 and early 2012, with planted area pretty much unchanged.

Cargill tempts Aussie farmers to tap soybean rally

30th Aug 2012, by Agrimoney
For any sceptics of the power of high prices to stimulate crop production, Australia is providing another example, with record soybean values sparking an attempt to turn the country into a force in the oilseed.

Cargill, the US-based agribusiness, has opened a drive to encourage Australian farmers to improve on the less than 40,000 hectares of the oilseed they currently grow, leaving the nation reliant largely on imports, which reached 560,000 tonnes last year, for soymeal supplies.

The group's Melbourne-based AWB business is offering growers a support package including a Aus$10-per-hectare rebate on – non-genetically modified- seed and some production insurance in a drive to gain domestic supplies to feed its three mills, one of which has a vegetable oils refining plant attached.

And the hopes of the programme succeeding rest in part on the elevated prices of soybeans, which on Thursday hit a record high for a spot contract of $17.80 ¾ a bushel, besides the benefits of adding another option to growers' choice for crop rotation.

"Soybean prices are very high at the moment. That has not always been the case," AWB spokesman Peter McBride told Agrimoney.com.

Market changes

A move by Australian growers into soybeans would represent the latest in a series of shifts which are changing the crop production and trade map, with Brazil expected by a margin to take over leadership from the US of world soybean exports in 2012-13, as farmers raise sowings to cash in on the price rally.

Ukraine has near-tripled corn exports in 2011-12 leaped to gain third place among exporters, behind the US and Argentina.

Argentina itself, the seventh-ranked barley exporter three years ago is set to be the biggest in 2012-13, with farmers switching from wheat in the face of export curbs which have limited their ability to tap strong international prices.

'Creatures of habit'

Australia's growing culture itself has traditionally been "pretty much founded on wheat", Mr McBride said.

"And like most of us, farmers are creatures of habit. They like to grow what they know because that is what they have always done it."

However, Australian growers too have shown the power of prices in encouraging growers to break with tradition.

The country, which until the 1990s had produced less than 100,000 tonnes of canola, the rapeseed variant, now harvests more than 3m tonnes, turning into a major exporter.

Russia 'will not bar exports' of waning grain crop

30th Aug 2012, by Agrimoney
Russia, where food officials are meeting on Friday to discuss dwindling wheat supplies, will not impose any restrictions on grain exports, the head of one of the country's top farm companies said, cautioning of a backlash if it does.

Maxim Basov, chief executive of Ros Agro - the listed holding company of the Rusagro group which has a landbank of 450,000 hectares - termed "economically incorrect" the idea that Russia would ban grain exports, or even impose levies on shipments, to protect domestic supplies after a drought-hit harvest.

The grain export ban imposed amid a drought in 2010 had "only benefited agricultural [grain] producers in other countries", by pushing up world prices while denying Russian growers access to them.

Repeat restrictions would present a fillip the state, through potential export taxes, and, in depressing grain prices, help meat producers "who are already doing very well", said Mr Basov, whose group is expanding in pork output as well as in grains and sugar beet.

'Losses and big problems'

However, they would present a threat to Russian grain growers for whom higher prices represented a means of making up a near-halving in yields in some areas.

"If Russia does not allow them to sell their grain for export, they will have losses and big problems," Mr Basov told Agrimoney.com.

"Russia does not want to have problems among producers in the southern region," a big source of grain exports, where dryness has hit crops particularly hard.

"Taking away from agricultural producers makes no economic sense."

'Will not go unnoticed'

A move to restrict exports, which many have speculated may result from Friday's agriculture ministry meeting, may also prompt a political backlash, he signalled.

The group, also a large beet producer with a 16.0% share of Russian sugar output, had joined with other producers and representatives of related industries such as ports to lobby the government to keep trade lines open.

A decision to impose restrictions "will not go unnoticed", Mr Basov said, adding that the anti-curbs movement was not "going to go away".

Another harvest downgrade

Ros Agro said that its own harvest had been hit by the dry weather, which it said had cut Russia's grains harvest to "about 70m tonnes".

Separately, SovEcon, the Moscow-based consultancy, on Thursday to cut its forecast for the Russian grains harvest to 70.5m tonnes from 71m-72.5m tonnes, and its estimate for wheat crop by 1m tonnes to a nine-year low of 38m tonnes.

Sovecon said that the Siberian wheat crop may fall by 4m tonnes to a 32-year low of 6m tonnes.

However, Mr Basov said that Ros Agro's yield losses had been offset by larger sowings, leaving the group with a harvest of some 500,000 tonnes, of which 200,000 tonnes were surplus to the group's own needs.

'Deficit situation'

Of this total, the group planned to sell all but 20,000 "closer to the end of the year", to exploit prices expected to rise as Russia's supplies dwindle.

The current pace of exports suggested that Russia "probably in November will already have a deficit situation", likely spurring imports from Kazakhstan, Mr Basov said.

Such a situation meant the prices in areas around Rus Agro's farms were likely to increase "by at least the transportation cost" of bringing in supplies.

Crop Traders Extend Bull Run As Rain Comes Too Late: Commodities

By Nicholas Larkin and Whitney McFerron - Aug 31, 2012
Bloomberg
Corn and soybean traders extended their longest bullish outlook in at least 11 months on speculation rain in the U.S. will come too late to revive crops after the worst drought in a half century.

Seventeen analysts surveyed by Bloomberg said corn will climb next week. A further six were bearish and four were neutral. Twenty expect gains in soybeans, four saw a drop and four predicted little change. The 19th straight bullish outlook is the longest run for corn since September and for soybeans since June 2011. Hedge funds’ bets on a rally in corn are the most in 16 months and near the largest for soybeans since at least 2006, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show.

The worst U.S. drought since 1956 and dry weather in Eastern Europe and Russia drove corn to a record $8.49 a bushel this month. Food prices tracked by the United Nations rose the most since 2009 in July. Rain in the Midwest may be too late to improve yields because farmers already started the corn harvest and soybeans are reaching maturity. Credit Suisse Group AG said Aug. 29 the rally will to continue for several more months.

“The crop needed these rains a month ago,” said Christopher Gadd, an analyst at Macquarie Group Ltd. in London. “We expect to see prices of corn move closer to $9 a bushel. The situation for soybeans looks far more difficult because demand remains resilient at these levels.”

Crops Rally

Soybeans advanced 45 percent to $17.5025 on the Chicago Board of Trade this year and set a record yesterday. Corn gained 25 percent to $8.0525, reaching an all-time high Aug. 10. The Standard & Poor’s GSCI gauge of 24 commodities added 3.5 percent and the MSCI All-Country World Index (MXWD) of equities rose 6.9 percent. Treasuries returned 2.3 percent, a Bank of America Corp. index shows.

Areas of central Illinois and Indiana had as much as 3 inches of rain in the past two weeks, twice the normal amount, National Weather Service data show.
Some Midwest regions received less than half of normal rainfall in the past 90 days. Tropical Storm Isaac may bring more than 4 inches of rain to areas of Illinois, Missouri and Indiana in the next five days, with smaller amounts stretching from southeast Iowa to Ohio, according to the service.

Corn production will drop 13 percent to 10.779 billion bushels this year, the lowest since 2006, and the soybean crop may be 12 percent lower at 2.692
billion bushels, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said Aug. 10. The agency updates its forecasts Sept. 12.

China Sales

The USDA announced daily export sales of soybeans to China exceeding 100,000 metric tons twice in the past two weeks. In the six weeks through Aug. 23, U.S. exporters sold 3.719 million tons for delivery in the current and upcoming marketing years, 12 percent more than in the same period a year earlier, USDA data show. Corn sales totaled 1.877 million tons, 49 percent less than a year earlier.

Costlier crops may curb demand from biofuel producers. U.S. ethanol output slid 11 percent since June 8 and in the week through July 20 reached the lowest level since the Energy Department began tracking weekly data in 2010. Producers are losing about 34 cents on each gallon of ethanol, based on fuel and corn contracts for September, data compiled by Bloomberg show. More U.S. corn went to ethanol refineries than into livestock feed in 2010-11 for the first time ever.

Cattle Slaughter

The jump in feed prices may spur livestock farmers to slaughter more animals. The domestic beef herd across ranches, feedlots and dairies dropped on July 1 to the smallest since at least 1973, USDA data show. Cattle spend 12 to 18 months eating grass before going to feedlots, where they consume mostly corn for five months until they are fat enough for slaughter.

The U.S. corn harvest is proceeding at the fastest pace ever because farmers planted early and the drought accelerated crop maturity, USDA data show. About 6 percent of corn was harvested as of Aug. 26, compared with none a year earlier. About 8 percent of soybean plants were dropping leaves, a sign of maturity, according to the USDA.

In other commodities, four of 10 traders and analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expect raw sugar to gain next week and the same amount were bearish. The commodity slipped 15 percent this year to 19.75 cents a pound on ICE Futures U.S. in New York.

Eleven people surveyed said copper will rise next week and eight predicted a drop, while eight were neutral. The metal for delivery in three months, the London Metal Exchange’s benchmark contract, decreased 0.2 percent to $7,583.75 a ton this year.

Comex Bourse

Twelve of 31 traders and analysts surveyed said gold would rise next week, 11 were bearish and eight were neutral. Futures on the Comex exchange in New York added 5.9 percent since the start of January to $1,658.40 an ounce.

Holdings in exchange-traded products backed by the metal jumped to a record 2,460.5 tons by Aug. 29, overtaking France and Italy in the past two weeks to become the world’s third- largest hoard when compared with national reserves, data compiled by Bloomberg and the International Monetary Fund show.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke speaks today in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, where he may give a clearer picture of his thinking on asset purchases to boost the economy at a time when China’s growth has slowed and Europe’s debt crisis lingers. Fed policy makers next meet Sept. 12-13.

The S&P GSCI gauge of raw materials entered a bull market on Aug. 21, climbing more than 20 percent from this year’s lowest close on June 21.

“This summer’s commodity rally is most likely over unless substantial policy stimulus is launched in the U.S., Europe or China,” said Filip Petersson, an analyst at SEB AB in Stockholm. “Now is the time to be long gold.”

Food Ministry to seek CCEA nod for additional 3 million tonne OMSS wheat sale

30 AUG, 2012, PTI
NEW DELHI: The Food Ministry is looking to sell additional three million tonne wheat in the open market to bulk consumers such as flour millers, a move aimed at containing price rise and offloading surplus stocks.

"We are taking a proposal before the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) for releasing another three million tonnes of wheat to bulk consumers under the open market sale scheme (OMSS)," Food Minister K V Thomas told reporters.

In June, the government had allocated sale of three million tonnes of wheat from its godowns under the OMSS to ease storage pressure during monsoon season.

If this proposal is approved by the CCEA, the total quantity of wheat to be sold in the open market would reach six million tonnes in this fiscal.

Asked about status of 3 million tonnes of wheat sale approved in June, Thomas said, "We have already released 1.3 million tonnes of wheat under OMSS. Another one million tonnes of wheat will be sold next month and the remaining quantity will be released thereafter."

The ministry has decided to release a total of six million tonnes of wheat under the OMSS, though the Commission for Agriculture Costs and Prices (CACP) had suggested 10 million tonnes of the grain, he said.

As per latest data, the entire quantity allocated in the first tranche has been sold to bulk users by the Food Corporation of India (FCI).

Under the OMSS, FCI has sold wheat initially at a floor price of Rs 1,170 per quintal through the tender process. The base price was hiked to Rs 1,285 from early this month.

Meanwhile, wholesale prices of wheat have been rising due to short supply of the grain in the open market and fears that wheat crop in the rabi season may be down due to poor rains.

Wholesale prices in the national capital have risen by 22 per cent to Rs 1,625 per quintal in the last one month.

As on August 1, the government has total stock of 76 million tonnes of foodgrains, out of which wheat is 47.52 million tonnes. The storage capacity is 71.41 million tonnes.

The government's stocks have risen sharply due to record production and procurement in the last few years.

Coal industry profits drop due to sluggish sales

2012-08-31
By Pan Jiayuan
(China Daily)
China's Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index, which tracks power station coal prices at six ports, rose by 1 yuan (16 cents) a ton this week, the first increase after 13 weeks of declines, according to cqcoal.com, a major coal trading website.

However, the industry outlook for the second half of the year is not optimistic due to lackluster demand and overstocking, analysts said.

The coal industry is facing a large-scale downturn. Shengyin & Wanguo Research data showed that among 40 listed coal companies that have filed interim reports, 28 had negative growth and six posted losses in the first half of 2012.

Total net profit attributable to equity holders of the 40 companies was 51.5 billion yuan ($8.13 billion), a 3.6 percent increase from the same period last year. Total net cash flow was 61.4 billion yuan, a 33.8 percent year-on-year decline.

The industry outlook for the next half is not optimistic, as coal prices at the origin are seeing constant declines, and overstocking has worsened the situation.

Thirty-two out of the 40 companies had an inventory value higher than last year, and 11 had an inventory growth rate of more than 50 percent.

Overall, the range of the coal industry's losses for the first half rose 4.28 percentage points from last year to 17.78 percent.

"Sales revenues fell sharply as a result of sluggish demand," cqcoal.com analyst Li Ting said. "The profit margin for coal industry is very low now, as coal prices are falling but cost of sales are rising."

To support the coal industry, the governments of Guizhou, Shaanxi, Shanxi and other coal-producing provinces have stepped up to rescue the market, cutting taxes and introducing preferential policies.

Guizhou province will levy local coal companies a 4 percent price adjustment fund, 6 percentage points down from the previous standard. Guizhou also cut the additional charge on coal sold outside the province at the beginning of the year.

Shaanxi province also introduced a series of fee-waiver policies, including a 50 percent discount on highway toll fees for vehicles carrying coal in August and September, and a temporary exemption of the coal price adjustment fund starting from August.

NTPC slashes investment

Coal supply uncertainty prompts largest power producer to cut commitments by Rs 50,000 cr

Sudheer Pal Singh & Jyoti Mukul / New Delhi Aug 31, 2012
Business Standard
The uncertainty surrounding coal availability has forced the country’s largest power producer NTPC Ltd to cut down its investment size by a fourth or around Rs 50,000 crore. The company had planned to invest more than Rs 2 lakh crore during the five-year period ending 2017.

With a current power generating capacity of 36,000 Megawatt (Mw), NTPC alone accounts for 92 per cent of India’s coal-based capacity in the central sector. Though the company has fast-tracked capacity addition and added 6,980 Mw in the last 21 months, which is almost 20 per cent of the total capacity it has added in the last 35 years, coal supply constraints will push 11,000-Mw capacity addition to the 13th Plan period starting 2017-18. “We had to review our 12th Plan capital expenditure estimate mainly because coal is not available. Around 11,000 Mw of our planned capacity is stuck for want of coal,” a company executive told Business Standard. This capacity is now expected to come up only in the 13th Plan.

An analysis of data for the 11th Plan ended March 2012 showed the installed generation capacity had increased 40 per cent but the actual generation rose 29 per cent. The installed capacity at the end of March this year was 199,877 Mw from 143,061 Mw at the end of March 2008. The availability was 857,239 million units (Mu) at the end of March this year from 664,660 Mu at the end of March 2008.

Being a big player, NTPC has been able to absorb fuel problems to some extent but in the case of private companies coal supply constraints have already started showing on their balance sheets. For instance, lower asset utilisation forced by a lack of coal and gas supply brought down the average plant load factor for Lanco Infratech to less than 60 per cent at its eight units. That saw the contribution of the power business to the company’s profitability fall by almost half to Rs 173 crore in the first quarter.

Similar is the case of Adani Power, which expects domestic linkages from Coal India to meet coal requirements for most of its 9,240-Mw capacity. “Though linkages are in place for most of Adani Power’s capacity, we anticipate risk to domestic coal supply because of the likely production shortage from Coal India in the medium term,” says Edelweiss in its latest report on the company.

NTPC is planning to add 14,500 Mw by March 2017 even after scaling down its target by 11,000 Mw for coal-based capacity and around 4,000 Mw of gas-based capacity.

“Coal linkages for some of these plants have been given without identifying the mines. Also, some of the blocks allocated to us have been taken back and not re-allocated. We may have installed at least a part of this 11,000 Mw in the current Plan. But that will not be possible now,” the executive said. Still, NTPC is better placed than private players. Of its 160-mt coal requirement, NTPC buys 125 mt from the domestic market and imports the rest.

MMTC to import nine lakh tonne coal for NTPC-SAIL Power

NTPC-SAIL Power is a joint venture between two state-run firms and it supplies power to SAIL's various plants

Press Trust of India / New Delhi Aug 30, 2012,
State-run trading firm MMTC has invited bids to import nine lakh tonnes coal for NTPC-SAIL Power Company's Bhilai plant in Chhattisgarh.

In a tender notice, MMTC said NTPC-SAIL Power Company have requirement of 9 lakh tonnes of imported coal for the current fiscal and the next for its 500 MW power plant.

The last date for receiving bids is September 11, it said, adding that the first consignment should reach the plant within 30 days of agreement.

"The imported coal to be supplied under this tender could be of any origin except India," it said stating that the coal must have a gross calorific value of 6,300 kilocalories a kilogram.

NTPC-SAIL Power is a joint venture between two state-run firms and it supplies power to SAIL's various plants in the adjoining area.

Baltic index down on low shipping activity

Thu Aug 30, 2012
Aug 30 (Reuters) - The Baltic Exchange's main sea freight index, tracking rates for ships carrying dry commodities, fell on Thursday on a sluggish Pacific and Atlantic activity.

The overall index, which reflects daily freight market prices for capesize, panamax, supramax and handysize dry bulk transport vessels, lost 1.53 percent to 707 points.

The Baltic Exchange's panamax index fell 3.81 percent to 758 points, with average daily earnings for panamaxes, which typically transport 60,000-70,000 tonne cargoes of coal or grains, down $245 at $6,024.

Panamax roundtrip rates in both basins fell about 4 percent on Wednesday to about $5,500 per day with few new cargoes in the Atlantic and a sluggish market in the Pacific, RS Platou Markets said in a note.

Analysts attributed the dip in panamax activity to slower coal and grain trade.

The capesize index was down 0.68 percent at 1,169 points.

Average daily earnings for capesizes, which usually transport 150,000-tonne cargoes such as iron ore and coal, were down $46 at $3,250.

Iron ore prices have fallen to their lowest since 2009. The price of the steel-making raw material has dropped by a third, or more than $45 per tonne since July as Chinese steel producers shunned cargoes amid declining demand.

Iron ore shipments account for around a third of seaborne volumes on the larger capesizes, and brokers said price developments remained a key factor for dry freight.

Average daily earnings for handysize ships were down $42 at $6,724, while that of supramax ships were down $28 at $8,938.

(Reporting by NR Sethuraman in Bangalore; editing by James Jukwey)

Bunker Prices : 31.08.2012

Baltic Dry Indices 30/08/2012

BDI             707          -      11
BCI           1169          -       8
BPI             758          -     30
BSI             855          -       3
BHSI          463          -       3

Thursday 30 August 2012

Coal row: firms face ambiguous future


CAG report indicts govt for improper allotment of blocks, de-allocation spectre rears its head
Jyoti Mukul / New Delhi Aug 30, 2012,
Business Standard
Will all of the 57 coal blocks mentioned in the recent Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)’s report be de-allocated by the government? If so, what ramifications will it have on the companies mentioned in the report, and the customers they serve? This is the question that is foremost on everybody’s mind, as the latest imbroglio concerning India’s natural resources unravels. This time, Prime Minister (PM) Manmohan Singh finds himself directly in the line of fire for being the coal minister twice during the period in which the alleged gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore were passed on to private coal miners.

In some ways, the beginnings of an answer lay embedded in the 32-paragraph speech delivered by the PM amidst a raucous din in Parliament. In it, two lines carried huge import for the industry — Singh revealed that his government had initiated action to cancel the allocations of allottees who did not take adequate follow-up action to commence production. Some 25 mines have already been de-allocated for not beginning production or showing few signs of progress.

Singh also mentioned that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is scutinising “allegations of malpractices”. While, it is not clear what exactly the CBI is looking into, a senior coal ministry official says, “CBI is asking questions on all 57 blocks and we are answering them.” Suddenly, just when the country had put the 2G spectrum auction scam behind it and readied itself for fresh auctions, another fiasco involving allotted natural resources threatens to become the next big scandal.

Priceless
194 coal blocks with aggregate geological reserves of 44,440 million tonne were allocated to different government and private parties till March 31, 2011. Now, coal blocks never had a value attached to them whenever they were allotted. Coal cannot be mined and sold except by the government’s own company, Coal India, and state mining companies. The law allows only captive use of coal in notified sectors such as iron and steel, power, cement, and coal to liquid projects.

None of the natural resources, in fact, are priced in the country when handed out to private companies for development and production. The logic is simple: The government encourages production of these resources, whether coal, iron ore or oil for use as inputs in other goods and services. No mineral acreage is allotted either through bidding or committment of a share to the government, except in the case of crude oil and coal bed methane. Coal has been coming at no cost to companies with domestic mines. All they had to do was to mine the coal and pay a royalty to the state governments.

De-allocation damage
Captive mines are the lifeblood of several industries and de-allocation could severely impede their future projects. A large portion of the country’s steel production, for instance, comes from captive iron ore and coking coal mines. The major beneficiaries of such captive resources, merely because of first mover advantage, have been Tata Steel and the government’s own, Steel Authority of India, though they, too, have to import coal.

Even in the case of ArcelorMittal, which is yet to start production in India, steel making would be backed by captive iron ore and coal mines. The Rampia and Seregarha coal blocks were allocated to ArcelorMittal for power generation at its proposed integrated steel plants in Odisha and Jharkhand, respectively. “We have invested money towards mine development and have completed prospecting at Seregarha and are awaiting allocation of a prospecting licence for Rampia (along with other partners),” a company spokesperson said in response to emailed queries. Coal mines are expected to generate 750 Mw each from the two power plants. This is also the case with JSW Steel Ltd, which has two mines allotted to it in West Bengal and Jharkhand, which it shares with other companies.

In the power sector, which uses over 80 per cent of the country’s coal production, 85 per cent of the 76,000 Mw additional capacity targeted to come up in the next five years will be based on coal. Among the 57 blocks, 20 have been allotted for power projects belonging to companies like Essar Power, Bhushan Power & Steel and Tata Power. Sponge and pig iron producers have another 25 blocks allotted to them either alone or in a consortium with other companies.

No science to allocation
The allocation of coal mines has been done through the screening committee route where representatives of various ministries go through applications that have recommendations from the state governments. There are no set criteria for selection. At the core of the CAG calculations lies the criticism that the 57 captive blocks did not start production, resulting in 1,302 million tonne of extractable reserves which are under lease to companies that got them without going through a competitive bidding process. While 20 of these blocks lie in the no-go areas where environment clearances were restricted, officials in the government and some of those companies maintain that it was not possible to develop the mines so quickly.

NTPC, which is not part of the CAG list because it is a government company, had also received de-allocation notices for five mines of which the government has agreed to return three. “The way coal mining is allocated to us is only a piece of land which is shown. There is no geotechnical investigation, no survey of land, no environmental clearance and no land acquisition. Unlike a UMPP (ultra-mega power project), we have to do everything. Coal India in its mines has not been able to do these activities in 12 years. International mines take a minimum of seven years to start mining,” says Arup Roy Choudhury, NTPC chairman and managing director, while questioning the charges of delay in production.

Do industries gain?
The financial gains that have been ascribed to the the 57 allottees based on the coal reserves are actually an estimate of the coal input cost in the end product. As Roy Choudhury points out, there is no gain in the case of power plants that operate under the regulated regime of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission simply because the cost is passed on to the consumers. “There cannot be a loss to the country but a benefit to the ultimate consumer. The regulator fixes cost and bills accordingly. Whatever the cost, whether coal is priced or comes from a captive mine, is a pass-through,” he says.

Even in the case of Essar, the company has plans to produce about 3000 Mw with an investment of about Rs 16,000 crore on the back of captive coal from one power plant each in Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh. Around 75 per cent of this power is to be sold under power purchase agreements with state governments. Of the remaining, around 12 per cent power from the Jharkhand unit has to be sold at just the variable cost and another 12.5 per cent at 15 per cent return on equity to the state government since the coal mine is situated in that state.

In its defence, the coal ministry had told CAG that 17 blocks were allotted to the power sector, where tariff is regulated on the basis of input costs and the transfer price of coal is assessed on actual cost basis. Even in the case of steel and cement, the ministry says a competitive market ensures the best benefit for consumers. Though most companies that figure in the CAG list and to which Business Standard spoke did not comment on the importance of blocks to their end-use projects, a senior executive in one of the companies says that the whole idea of getting private players into the business of coal mining is to get a larger quantity of products, whether it was power or steel, into the market at cheaper rates.

Even if bidding is introduced, higher price of coal is something that does not bother private players as much as the availability and access to raw material and fuel through stable contracts. The market, after all, gets adjusted to a higher price as the entire industry reacts to it. Regardless of how the CAG report plays out, the fact is that a natural resource that was once taken for granted now has a considerable value attached to it, changing its economics for times to come.

Coal row: firms face ambiguous future


CAG report indicts govt for improper allotment of blocks, de-allocation spectre rears its head
Jyoti Mukul / New Delhi Aug 30, 2012,
Business Standard
Will all of the 57 coal blocks mentioned in the recent Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)’s report be de-allocated by the government? If so, what ramifications will it have on the companies mentioned in the report, and the customers they serve? This is the question that is foremost on everybody’s mind, as the latest imbroglio concerning India’s natural resources unravels. This time, Prime Minister (PM) Manmohan Singh finds himself directly in the line of fire for being the coal minister twice during the period in which the alleged gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore were passed on to private coal miners.

In some ways, the beginnings of an answer lay embedded in the 32-paragraph speech delivered by the PM amidst a raucous din in Parliament. In it, two lines carried huge import for the industry — Singh revealed that his government had initiated action to cancel the allocations of allottees who did not take adequate follow-up action to commence production. Some 25 mines have already been de-allocated for not beginning production or showing few signs of progress.

Singh also mentioned that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is scutinising “allegations of malpractices”. While, it is not clear what exactly the CBI is looking into, a senior coal ministry official says, “CBI is asking questions on all 57 blocks and we are answering them.” Suddenly, just when the country had put the 2G spectrum auction scam behind it and readied itself for fresh auctions, another fiasco involving allotted natural resources threatens to become the next big scandal.

Priceless
194 coal blocks with aggregate geological reserves of 44,440 million tonne were allocated to different government and private parties till March 31, 2011. Now, coal blocks never had a value attached to them whenever they were allotted. Coal cannot be mined and sold except by the government’s own company, Coal India, and state mining companies. The law allows only captive use of coal in notified sectors such as iron and steel, power, cement, and coal to liquid projects.

None of the natural resources, in fact, are priced in the country when handed out to private companies for development and production. The logic is simple: The government encourages production of these resources, whether coal, iron ore or oil for use as inputs in other goods and services. No mineral acreage is allotted either through bidding or committment of a share to the government, except in the case of crude oil and coal bed methane. Coal has been coming at no cost to companies with domestic mines. All they had to do was to mine the coal and pay a royalty to the state governments.

De-allocation damage
Captive mines are the lifeblood of several industries and de-allocation could severely impede their future projects. A large portion of the country’s steel production, for instance, comes from captive iron ore and coking coal mines. The major beneficiaries of such captive resources, merely because of first mover advantage, have been Tata Steel and the government’s own, Steel Authority of India, though they, too, have to import coal.

Even in the case of ArcelorMittal, which is yet to start production in India, steel making would be backed by captive iron ore and coal mines. The Rampia and Seregarha coal blocks were allocated to ArcelorMittal for power generation at its proposed integrated steel plants in Odisha and Jharkhand, respectively. “We have invested money towards mine development and have completed prospecting at Seregarha and are awaiting allocation of a prospecting licence for Rampia (along with other partners),” a company spokesperson said in response to emailed queries. Coal mines are expected to generate 750 Mw each from the two power plants. This is also the case with JSW Steel Ltd, which has two mines allotted to it in West Bengal and Jharkhand, which it shares with other companies.

In the power sector, which uses over 80 per cent of the country’s coal production, 85 per cent of the 76,000 Mw additional capacity targeted to come up in the next five years will be based on coal. Among the 57 blocks, 20 have been allotted for power projects belonging to companies like Essar Power, Bhushan Power & Steel and Tata Power. Sponge and pig iron producers have another 25 blocks allotted to them either alone or in a consortium with other companies.

No science to allocation
The allocation of coal mines has been done through the screening committee route where representatives of various ministries go through applications that have recommendations from the state governments. There are no set criteria for selection. At the core of the CAG calculations lies the criticism that the 57 captive blocks did not start production, resulting in 1,302 million tonne of extractable reserves which are under lease to companies that got them without going through a competitive bidding process. While 20 of these blocks lie in the no-go areas where environment clearances were restricted, officials in the government and some of those companies maintain that it was not possible to develop the mines so quickly.

NTPC, which is not part of the CAG list because it is a government company, had also received de-allocation notices for five mines of which the government has agreed to return three. “The way coal mining is allocated to us is only a piece of land which is shown. There is no geotechnical investigation, no survey of land, no environmental clearance and no land acquisition. Unlike a UMPP (ultra-mega power project), we have to do everything. Coal India in its mines has not been able to do these activities in 12 years. International mines take a minimum of seven years to start mining,” says Arup Roy Choudhury, NTPC chairman and managing director, while questioning the charges of delay in production.

Do industries gain?
The financial gains that have been ascribed to the the 57 allottees based on the coal reserves are actually an estimate of the coal input cost in the end product. As Roy Choudhury points out, there is no gain in the case of power plants that operate under the regulated regime of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission simply because the cost is passed on to the consumers. “There cannot be a loss to the country but a benefit to the ultimate consumer. The regulator fixes cost and bills accordingly. Whatever the cost, whether coal is priced or comes from a captive mine, is a pass-through,” he says.

Even in the case of Essar, the company has plans to produce about 3000 Mw with an investment of about Rs 16,000 crore on the back of captive coal from one power plant each in Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh. Around 75 per cent of this power is to be sold under power purchase agreements with state governments. Of the remaining, around 12 per cent power from the Jharkhand unit has to be sold at just the variable cost and another 12.5 per cent at 15 per cent return on equity to the state government since the coal mine is situated in that state.

In its defence, the coal ministry had told CAG that 17 blocks were allotted to the power sector, where tariff is regulated on the basis of input costs and the transfer price of coal is assessed on actual cost basis. Even in the case of steel and cement, the ministry says a competitive market ensures the best benefit for consumers. Though most companies that figure in the CAG list and to which Business Standard spoke did not comment on the importance of blocks to their end-use projects, a senior executive in one of the companies says that the whole idea of getting private players into the business of coal mining is to get a larger quantity of products, whether it was power or steel, into the market at cheaper rates.

Even if bidding is introduced, higher price of coal is something that does not bother private players as much as the availability and access to raw material and fuel through stable contracts. The market, after all, gets adjusted to a higher price as the entire industry reacts to it. Regardless of how the CAG report plays out, the fact is that a natural resource that was once taken for granted now has a considerable value attached to it, changing its economics for times to come.

This is no ordinary slowdown


R. SRINIVASAN, THE HINDU BUSINESS LINE

A combination of virtual inaction on the policy front and a very real slowdown in growth both in India and abroad have inflicted unprecedented damage on business sentiment.

August 29, 2012:
Normally, I avoid the use of the first person in this column. However, this time, I would request the reader’s indulgence to allow me to intrude into the column, since the example I would like to use is difficult to convey in the third person.

Last week, I caught up with an old friend of mine, one of India’s thousands of bright, talented managers who are powering the India Growth Story. He is currently the CEO of a medium scale developer. Usually cheerful and optimistic, this time around, he was unusually gloomy. “Another bad quarter or two and I think I will be out of a job,” he told me. “And this time, there are no jobs out there.”

That last statement was a bigger surprise, since I was under the impression that my friend was one of the fortunate band of Indians who would never have to worry about landing a lucrative position, leave alone just another job. After all, he was an IIT engineer, a management graduate from a leading business school, and someone who had rotated rapidly and successfully through several of India’s growth sectors — consumer products, telecom, real estate, and so on — and had followed the standard career path of the IIT/MBA cohort through middle and senior management to the corner office and the CEO tag by the time he hit his forties.

Policy paralysis

His was the kind of talent India Inc has been saying it is short of. I was under the impression that while the slowdown may be showing in the big picture numbers, it has little relevance at the individual, personal level to people like my friend, one of India’s best and brightest. But somewhere along the road from UPA-I to UPA-II, it appears, his personal career graph, and economy’s growth curve, have coalesced — on the way down.

The slowdown is no longer a slowdown for many, it transpired on further talk. It had become a very real, very punishing recession. The trouble is, amidst the clamorous din raised by scams and scandals, his voice, like the voice of tens of thousands of others like him, struggling to keep their businesses going — and growing — amidst increasingly difficult conditions, has been lost. Amidst the apparent obsession of politics and bureaucracy with ‘coal gates’ and ‘airport gates’, worries like the declining fortunes of iron foundries or underwear manufacturers is not getting any political or policy making bandwidth. Not that others with much bigger metaphorical lungs haven’t tried.

Housing lender Housing Development Finance Corporation’s (HDFC) widely respected chairman Deepak Parekh became the latest voice to join the growing chorus against the government’s ‘policy paralysis’. “You cannot continue to govern like this. All the deficit numbers, financial numbers will go crazy. You will be downgraded for sure,” he said in a television interview.

He is not alone. Everyone from CII President and Godrej Group Chairman Adi Godrej to Infosys founder N. R. Narayana Murthy to Wipro chief Azim Premji — all people who are currently managing to run globally competitive enterprises in India — have said virtually the same thing.

‘Self-inflicted’ challenges

Speaking to analysts after announcing Wipro’s results, Premji said, “We are working without a leader as a country. If we do not change, we would be down for years.” Infy’s Murthy, in an interview to investment banking firm Morgan Stanley, said India’s current challenges were “self-inflicted.”

Self-inflicted or externally perpetrated, the combination of virtual inaction on the policy front, and a very real slowdown in growth both in India and abroad, have inflicted serious damage on the economy. Forget the big picture numbers — the ever decreasing GDP growth forecasts, or the continued downturn in the Index of Industrial Production numbers — a drive around any industrial estate is enough to confirm this. The slowdown is still a slowdown for some, but for a vast majority of India’s real manufacturing backbone — the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) sector — it has long since turned into a very real, and very harsh recession.

Power deficit

Take a look at what, until recently, was a very thriving part of the MSME sector. Although there are a few big ticket players in the electrical and electronics manufacturing sector, the bulk of the participants fall in the MSME sector. Everything from the nameless pieces of electrical wiring to the switches and fuses of unknown provenance which your electrician pulls out of his toolbox, to electrical transformer and switching equipment in your colony, have been probably manufactured by one of the tens of thousands of small to medium scale manufacturers who populate this sector.

Now, for the first time in a decade, the electrical and electronics manufacturing sector has shown negative growth in India. According to numbers released by the Indian Electrical and Electronics Manufacturers Association (IEEMA), the apex Indian industry association of manufacturers of electrical, industrial electronics and allied equipment, for the first time since 2002, the Indian electrical equipment industry has seen a negative growth of 2.4 per cent in the first quarter (Q1) of the current fiscal (2012-13), compared to the corresponding period of Q1 FY12 (a growth of 13.82 per cent) and sequential quarter Q4 FY12 (a growth of 14.10 per cent).

Commenting on the Q1 FY13 results, IEEMA President Ramesh Chandak said, “Ironically in Q1 of FY13, there was over-achievement of the country’s power generation and transmission and sub-stations capacity addition targets. So, under ideal conditions, domestic manufacturers of power equipment should have correspondingly gained business, but reality is otherwise.”

That is because, during the same period, imports have more than doubled. So, while the Government appears to have finally woken up to the fact that unless India’s growing power deficit problem is addressed, whatever growth advantages the country has secured so far is likely to be lost and in spending money to try and salvage the situation, the benefits of this are going elsewhere.

India’s loss, China’s gain

In the case of the electricals and electronics manufacturing sector, it appears India’s loss has been China’s gain. China now accounts for 44 per cent of India’s electricals imports, says IEEMA. And imports from China in the power sector alone are growing by 59 per cent a year.

This is not news to anybody, of course, least of all, the government. After all, it did set up the National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council way back in September of 2004, to address precisely this issue. The Council has even come up with a national strategy for manufacturing competitiveness, and several other reports and whitepapers.

Clearly, those who are supposed to have looked into these suggestions, and acted upon them, have been occupied with other things. Which is why IEEMA members, and members of dozens of other industry associations like it, are facing a gloomy future. And why my CEO friend is gearing up to spend some ‘quality time’ with his family soon.